Club Lead Guide

As a club lead (admin), you play a crucial role in reviewing papers and helping fellow students improve their research. You also help manage club activities.

What You Can Do

Club leads have all member capabilities plus the following:

Claim Papers

Self-assign papers from the review queue

Review Papers

Read papers and provide detailed feedback

Request Revisions

Ask authors to make improvements

Manage Events

Create and edit club events

Post Updates

Share announcements with members

View All Papers

See all submitted papers, not just your own

Note: Club leads cannot make final accept/reject decisions on papers. Only advisors (teachers) can accept, reject, or publish papers.

Review Workflow

1

Check the Review Queue

Visit the Review Queue to see papers that need reviewers. Papers show how many reviewers they need (max 2 per paper).

Tips:

  • Papers waiting 3+ days are flagged with a warning
  • You can see who else has claimed a paper
  • You cannot claim your own papers
2

Claim a Paper

Click 'Claim Review' to assign yourself as a reviewer. The paper will appear in your 'My Reviews' list.

Tips:

  • Only claim papers you have time to review
  • Consider your expertise in the subject area
  • Each paper needs 2 reviewers total
3

Read and Review

Carefully read the paper and add comments. Use the review interface to note specific issues and provide overall feedback.

Tips:

  • Be constructive and specific
  • Note both strengths and areas for improvement
  • Reference specific pages or sections
4

Submit Your Review

Provide an overall recommendation (Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject) and submit your review.

Tips:

  • Your recommendation guides the final decision
  • Include overall comments summarizing your feedback
  • Be fair and objective
5

Re-Review Revisions

If an author submits a revision, you'll need to re-review it. You'll see the author's revision summary and your previous comments.

Tips:

  • Check if the author addressed your comments
  • Compare the new version to your feedback
  • Update your recommendation if appropriate

The Claim System

WY Researchers uses a self-assignment claim system for reviews. Here's how it works:

  • 12 reviewers required: Each paper needs exactly two reviewers before a final decision can be made.
  • 2Self-assignment: You choose which papers to review by clicking "Claim Review" - no one assigns you.
  • 3Transparency: Everyone can see who has claimed what, promoting accountability.
  • 4Continuity: If an author revises their paper, the original reviewers stay assigned and re-review.

Review Best Practices

Be Constructive

  • Focus on how to improve, not just what's wrong
  • Explain why something needs changing
  • Offer specific suggestions

Be Specific

  • Reference page numbers and sections
  • Quote the text you're commenting on
  • Avoid vague statements like "needs work"

Be Fair

  • Evaluate the work objectively
  • Acknowledge strengths as well as weaknesses
  • Apply consistent standards to all papers

Be Timely

  • Complete reviews within a reasonable timeframe
  • Don't let papers sit unclaimed
  • Notify leads if you can't complete a review

Admin Responsibilities

In addition to reviewing papers, club leads help manage the club:

Events Management

Create and manage club events like workshops, meetings, and guest speaker sessions. Access via Admin > Manage Events.

Club Updates

Post announcements and updates for members. Access via Admin > Club Updates.

Competitions

Create and manage research competitions. Access via Admin > Manage Competitions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I unclaim a paper I've claimed?

Contact an advisor to unclaim a paper. This should only be done if absolutely necessary.

What if I disagree with the other reviewer?

That's okay! Different perspectives are valuable. The advisor considers both reviews when making the final decision.

How do I become a club lead?

Club lead status is assigned by advisors based on involvement and demonstrated commitment.

Can I review papers from friends?

Yes, but maintain objectivity. Apply the same standards you would to any paper.